From: Collin Kidder <adderd@kkmfg.com>
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Annoying Reply-To
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:25:47 -0400
Message-ID: <4900B39B.2040508@kkmfg.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200810231701.m9NH1ML21995@momjian.us>
References: <200810231701.m9NH1ML21995@momjian.us>
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>> Mikkel is right, every other well-organized mailing list I've ever been on
>> handles things the sensible way he suggests, but everybody on his side
>> who's been on lists here for a while already knows this issue is a dead
>> horse. Since I use the most advanced e-mail client on the market I just
>> work around that the settings here are weird, it does annoy me a bit
>> anytime I stop to think about it though.
>>
>
> I think this is the crux of the problem --- if I subscribed to multiple
> email lists, and some have "rely" going to the list and some have
> "reply" going to the author, I would have to think about the right reply
> option every time I send email.
>
> Fortunately, every email list I subscribe to and manage behaves like the
> Postgres lists.
>
>
I find it difficult to believe that every list you subscribe to behaves
as the Postgres list does. Not that I'm doubting you, just that it's
difficult given that the PG list is the ONLY list I've ever been on to
use Reply as just replying to the author. Every other list I've ever
seen has reply as the list address and requires Reply All to reply to
the original poster. Thus, I would fall into the category of people who
have to think hard in order to do the correct thing when posting to this
list.
I've checked and I can't even find an option to make Thunderbird (the
client I use in windows) reply to the list properly with the reply
button (it just cannot be set that way.) You must use Reply All. You
might say that that makes Thunderbird crippled but I see it more as a
sign that nobody outside of a few fussy RFC worshipping types would ever
want the behavior of the Postgre list. Yes, I'll have to live with the
current behavior. Yes, it's an RFC standard. But, even after having
heard the arguments I'm not convinced that this list's behavior is
desirable. YMMV.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: adderd@kkmfg.com, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Annoying Reply-To
In-Reply-To: <4900B39B.2040508@kkmfg.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox