From: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
To: Jignesh K. Shah <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Cc: Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
Subject: Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:55:30 -0500
Message-ID: <49BA3BA2.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49BA742D.3050203@sun.com>
References: <C5DEE151.33BA%scott@richrelevance.com>
<49BA53CF.4020702@sun.com>
<49BA742D.3050203@sun.com>
>>> "Jignesh K. Shah" <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM> wrote:
> usr sys wt idl sze
> 38 11 0 50 64
The fact that you're maxing out at 50% CPU utilization has me
wondering -- are there really 64 CPUs here, or are there 32 CPUs with
"hyperthreading" technology (or something conceptually similar)?
-Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov, J.K.Shah@Sun.COM, scott@richrelevance.com
Subject: Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
In-Reply-To: <49BA3BA2.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox