pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Stange <stange@rentec.com>
To: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Jignesh K. Shah <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: 8.4 Performance improvements:  was Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:20:04 -0400
Message-ID: <49BA79A4.9030208@rentec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87prgl4jbh.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>
References: <C5DDBB25.3333%scott@richrelevance.com>
	<49B922C0.6050700@sun.com>
	<alpine.GSO.2.01.0903121613270.1925@westnet.com>
	<49BA5537.8060002@sun.com>
	<87prgl4jbh.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>

Gregory Stark wrote:
> A minute ago I said:
>
>  AFAIK Opensolaris doesn't implement posix_fadvise() so there's no benefit. It
>  would be great to hear if you could catch the ear of the right people to get
>  an implementation committed. Depending on how the i/o scheduler system is
>  written it might not even be hard -- the Linux implementation of WILLNEED is
>  all of 20 lines.
>
> I noticed after sending it that that's slightly unfair. The 20-line function
> calls another function (which calls another function) to do the real readahead
> work. That function (mm/readahead.c:__do_page_cache_readahead()) is 48 lines.
>
>   
It's implemented.   I'm guessing it's not what you want to see though:

http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/lib/libc/port/gen/posix_fadvise.c





view thread (14+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <49BA79A4.9030208@rentec.com>
Permalink:  ../49BA79A4.9030208@rentec.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/49BA79A4.9030208@rentec.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: stange@rentec.com, stark@enterprisedb.com, J.K.Shah@Sun.COM, gsmith@gregsmith.com
  Subject: Re: 8.4 Performance improvements:  was Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
  In-Reply-To: <49BA79A4.9030208@rentec.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox