From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Jignesh K. Shah <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM>
Cc: decibel@decibel.org, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:33:30 -0700
Message-ID: <49CFE92A.8000101@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49BD67A4.7020106@sun.com>
References: <C5DDBB25.3333%scott@richrelevance.com>
<29836.1236826066@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<49B8861C.2000005@sun.com>
<1E9C2E4B-4C0C-4343-B244-388DA2047870@decibel.org>
<49BD67A4.7020106@sun.com>
On 3/15/09 1:40 PM, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
>
>
> decibel wrote:
>> On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:48 PM, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
>>> Fair enough.. Well I am now appealing to all who has a fairly decent
>>> sized hardware want to try it out and see whether there are "gains",
>>> "no-changes" or "regressions" based on your workload. Also it will
>>> help if you report number of cpus when you respond back to help
>>> collect feedback.
EAStress (the J2EE benchmark from Spec) would be perfect for this, and
we (community) have a license for it.
However, EAstress really requires 2-3 J2EE servers to keep the DB server
busy.
--Josh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, J.K.Shah@Sun.COM, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, scott@richrelevance.com, Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov
Subject: Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
In-Reply-To: <49CFE92A.8000101@agliodbs.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox