From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
To: Lists <lists@on-track.ca>
Cc: ries van Twisk <typo3@rvt.dds.nl>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Best replication solution?
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 11:26:50 +0300
Message-ID: <49D9BCCA.7060609@enterprisedb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49D9293D.2020101@on-track.ca>
References: <49D8FA31.8010407@on-track.ca>
<480ED41A-B4AF-4A14-A10B-9F7181D7949D@rvt.dds.nl>
<49D9293D.2020101@on-track.ca>
Lists wrote:
> Server is a dual core xeon 3GB ram and 2 mirrors of 15k SAS drives (1
> for most data, 1 for wal and a few tables and indexes)
>
> In total all databases on the server are about 10G on disk (about 2GB in
> pgdump format).
I'd suggest buying as much RAM as you can fit into the server. RAM is
cheap, and with a database of that size more cache could have a dramatic
effect.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com, lists@on-track.ca, typo3@rvt.dds.nl
Subject: Re: Best replication solution?
In-Reply-To: <49D9BCCA.7060609@enterprisedb.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox