pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Linux I/O tuning:  CFQ vs. deadline
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:45:10 -0500
Message-ID: <4B6FDD26.9010106@2ndquadrant.com> (raw)

Recently I've made a number of unsubstantiated claims that the deadline 
scheduler on Linux does bad things compared to CFQ when running 
real-world mixed I/O database tests.  Unfortunately every time I do one 
of these I end up unable to release the results due to client 
confidentiality issues.  However, I do keep an eye out for people who 
run into the same issues in public benchmarks, and I just found one:  
http://insights.oetiker.ch/linux/fsopbench/

The problem analyzed in the "Deadline considered harmful" section looks 
exactly like what I run into:  deadline just does some bad things when 
the I/O workload gets complicated.  And the conclusion reached there, 
"the deadline scheduler did not have advantages in any of our test 
cases", has been my conclusion for every round of pgbench-based testing 
I've done too.  In that case, the specific issue is that reads get 
blocked badly when checkpoint writes are doing heavier work; you can see 
the read I/O numbers reported by "vmstat 1" go completely to zero for a 
second or more when it happens.  That can happen with CFQ, too, but it 
consistently seems more likely to occur with deadline.

-- 
Greg Smith    2ndQuadrant   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com  www.2ndQuadrant.com




view thread (20+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4B6FDD26.9010106@2ndquadrant.com>
Permalink:  ../4B6FDD26.9010106@2ndquadrant.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4B6FDD26.9010106@2ndquadrant.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: greg@2ndquadrant.com
  Subject: Re: Linux I/O tuning:  CFQ vs. deadline
  In-Reply-To: <4B6FDD26.9010106@2ndquadrant.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox