From: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>
Cc: Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SSD + RAID
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:39:33 -0500
Message-ID: <4B8331D5.7000802@2ndquadrant.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B832B3E.9080207@mark.mielke.cc>
References: <201002211410.o1LEAht05941@momjian.us>
<4B814920.1040204@cheapcomplexdevices.com>
<4B82187A.7060604@2ndquadrant.com>
<4B822DFF.50501@tweakers.net>
<4B8329A3.4040003@2ndquadrant.com>
<4B832B3E.9080207@mark.mielke.cc>
Mark Mielke wrote:
> I had read the above when posted, and then looked up SRAM. SRAM seems
> to suggest it will hold the data even after power loss, but only for a
> period of time. As long as power can restore within a few minutes, it
> seemed like this would be ok?
The normal type of RAM everyone uses is DRAM, which requires constrant
"refresh" cycles to keep it working and is pretty power hungry as a
result. Power gone, data gone an instant later.
There is also Non-volatile SRAM that includes an integrated battery (
http://www.maxim-ic.com/quick_view2.cfm/qv_pk/2648 is a typical
example), and that sort of design can be used to build the sort of
battery-backed caches that RAID controllers provide. If Intel's drives
were built using a NV-SRAM implementation, I'd be a happy owner of one
instead of a constant critic of their drives.
But regular old SRAM is still completely volatile and loses its contents
very quickly after power fails. I doubt you'd even get minutes of time
before it's gone. The ease at which data loss failures with these Intel
drives continue to be duplicated in the field says their design isn't
anywhere near good enough to be considered non-volatile.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: greg@2ndquadrant.com, mark@mark.mielke.cc, acmmailing@tweakers.net
Subject: Re: SSD + RAID
In-Reply-To: <4B8331D5.7000802@2ndquadrant.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox