From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Kevin Kempter <kevink@consistentstate.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: partitioned tables query not using indexes
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:29:14 -0800
Message-ID: <4B8AD21A.2020904@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201002240736.36341.kevink@consistentstate.com>
References: <201002240736.36341.kevink@consistentstate.com>
> However the same query against the base table when specifying the check
> constraint key in the where clause produces sequential scans:
Does the "master" table have the same indexes as the slave partitions?
--Josh Berkus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, kevink@consistentstate.com
Subject: Re: partitioned tables query not using indexes
In-Reply-To: <4B8AD21A.2020904@agliodbs.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox