pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 3ware vs. MegaRAID
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 18:11:34 +0200
Message-ID: <4BBF51B6.8070307@krogh.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BBF477A.4080701@2ndquadrant.com>
References: <4BB1FAAF.7050406@wp.pl>
	<4BB23254.2040109@2ndquadrant.com>
	<4BBB662C.8030102@wp.pl>
	<23D26E38-9852-4EB6-9DF9-FCB2EAE1EE6C@richrelevance.com>
	<x2jca24673e1004072044hac4475e8g3a3fefdcda6ebefe@mail.gmail.com>
	<4BBECA06.40602@krogh.cc>
	<4BBF477A.4080701@2ndquadrant.com>

On 2010-04-09 17:27, Greg Smith wrote:
> Jesper Krogh wrote:
>> Can someone shed "simple" light on an extremely simple question.
>> How do you physicallly get 48 drives attached to an LSI that claims to
>> only have 2 internal and 2 external ports?
>> (the controller claims to support up to 240 drives).
>
> There are these magic boxes that add "SAS expansion", which basically 
> splits a single port so you can connect more drives to it.  An example 
> from a vendor some of the regulars on this list like is 
> http://www.aberdeeninc.com/abcatg/kitjbod-1003.htm
>
> You normally can't buy these except as part of an integrated drive 
> chassis subsystem.  If you get one that has an additional pass-through 
> port, that's how you can stack these into multiple layers and hit 
> really large numbers of disks.

I've spent quite some hours googling today. Am I totally wrong if the:
HP MSA-20/30/70 and Sun Oracle J4200's:
https://shop.sun.com/store/product/53a01251-2fce-11dc-9482-080020a9ed93
are of the same type just from "major" vendors.

That would enable me to reuse the existing server and moving to something
like Intel's X25-M 160GB disks with just a higher amount (25) in a MSA-70.

-- 
Jesper .. that's beginning to look like a decent plan.



view thread (16+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4BBF51B6.8070307@krogh.cc>
Permalink:  ../4BBF51B6.8070307@krogh.cc/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4BBF51B6.8070307@krogh.cc

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jesper@krogh.cc
  Subject: Re: 3ware vs. MegaRAID
  In-Reply-To: <4BBF51B6.8070307@krogh.cc>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox