pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Elias Ghanem <e.ghanem@acteos.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Fwd: Dead lock
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:36:58 +0300
Message-ID: <4C164C9A.5030607@acteos.com> (raw)

Hi,
Actually i guess the problem is related to the way PG uses to aquire 
lock on the rows that will be updated.
Suppose the update query will affect 5 rows: A, B, C, D and E.
Apparently the folowing senario is happening:
     1- Transaction1 locks row A
     2- Trnasaction2 locks row B
     3- Transaction1 updates row A
     4- Tranasaction2 updates row B
     5- Transaction1 *tries *to acquire lock on row B(and fail because 
row B is still locked by transaction2)
     6- Transaction2 *tries *to acquire lock on row A(and fail because 
row A is still locked by transaction1)
Hence the dead lock.
Is this a plausible explanation of what is going on?
If yes, what can be done to avoid the dead lock?
Thanks again.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Dead lock
Date: 	Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:50:43 +0300
From: 	Elias Ghanem <e.ghanem@acteos.com>
To: 	pgsql-performance@postgresql.org



Hi all,
I have 2 data bases trying to perform an update query at the same time 
on a same table in a third data base using db link.
I'm getting a dead lock exception:
ERROR:  deadlock detected
DETAIL:  Process 27305 waits for ShareLock on transaction 55575; blocked 
by process 27304.
Process 27304 waits for ShareLock on transaction 55576; blocked by 
process 27305.
HINT:  See server log for query details.
Actually the folowing function is installed on 2 dbs DB1 and DB2. This 
function issues an update query on DB3.
When this function is running simultaneously on DB1 and DB2, it produces 
a dead lock making one of the functions (in DB1 or DB2) stop with the 
above exception:
Is it normal? should'nt postgres be able to handle such situations, for 
ex:  let one transaction wait untill the other commits or rollback then 
continue with the first transaction?
Is there a parameter that should be set in postgresql.conf to allow 
handling of concurrent transaction...?

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION TEST_DB_LINK(VARCHAR)
RETURNS VOID AS'
DECLARE
C INTEGER;
P ALIAS FOR $1;
DUMMY  VARCHAR;
BEGIN
     C:= 0;
     LOOP
         EXIT WHEN C > 15;
         C:= C+1;
         SELECT INTO DUMMY DBLINK_EXEC(''CONNECTION_STRING TO DB3', 
''UPDATE IN_FICHE_PRODUIT SET VALIDE = 1'');
     RAISE NOTICE ''%, %'', C,P;
     END LOOP;
END;'
LANGUAGE 'plpgsql';

Thanks for your time.

view thread (6+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4C164C9A.5030607@acteos.com>
Permalink:  ../4C164C9A.5030607@acteos.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4C164C9A.5030607@acteos.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: e.ghanem@acteos.com
  Subject: Re: Fwd: Dead lock
  In-Reply-To: <4C164C9A.5030607@acteos.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox