pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>
To: Michael March <mmarch@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 12:12:07 +0200
Message-ID: <4C5E82F7.8040700@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikXLYc32Jyr5Fb8VeVNt6R86mCcF+0CkTHALd8W@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikXLYc32Jyr5Fb8VeVNt6R86mCcF+0CkTHALd8W@mail.gmail.com>

Michael March wrote:
> If anyone is interested I just completed a series of benchmarks of 
> stock Postgresql running on a normal HDD vs a SSD.  
>
> If you don't want to read the post, the summary is that SSDs are 5 to 
> 7 times faster than a 7200RPM HDD drive under a pgbench load.
>
> http://it-blog.5amsolutions.com/2010/08/performance-of-postgresql-ssd-vs.html
>
> Is this what everyone else is seeing?
I tested a SSD with a capacitor and posted conclusions here 
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-07/msg00449.php

regards,
Yeb Havinga

view thread (37+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4C5E82F7.8040700@gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../4C5E82F7.8040700@gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4C5E82F7.8040700@gmail.com

copy link · copy postgr.es

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: yebhavinga@gmail.com, mmarch@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD
  In-Reply-To: <4C5E82F7.8040700@gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox