pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: XFS vs Ext3, and schedulers, for WAL
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:59:20 -0700
Message-ID: <4CB35E88.4040303@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1286820383.25541.45.camel@jd-desktop>
References: <4CAD0214.50304@agliodbs.com>
	<4CB34E50.3080201@agliodbs.com>
	<1286820383.25541.45.camel@jd-desktop>


> http://www.commandprompt.com/blogs/joshua_drake/2008/04/is_that_performance_i_smell_ext2_vs_ext3_on_...
> 
> It doesn't cover XFS but it provides a decent and simple comparison on
> ext2/ext3 etc...

Yeah, it doesn't test actual log writing, though.  Nor specific settings
even for those two filesystems.  So it's still a mystery ...

-- 
                                  -- Josh Berkus
                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                                     http://www.pgexperts.com



view thread (4+ messages)

Message-ID: <4CB35E88.4040303@agliodbs.com>
Permalink:  ../4CB35E88.4040303@agliodbs.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4CB35E88.4040303@agliodbs.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, jd@commandprompt.com
  Subject: Re: XFS vs Ext3, and schedulers, for WAL
  In-Reply-To: <4CB35E88.4040303@agliodbs.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox