pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>
To: mladen.gogala@vmsinfo.com
Cc: Kyriacos Kyriacou <kyriacosk@prime-tel.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: MVCC performance issue
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 08:10:56 +0800
Message-ID: <4CDF2910.8010105@postnewspapers.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CDEDB3A.2070606@vmsinfo.com>
References: <8BCBF9DB739F034B87FE7C7D30EAE55C240D4BC8@hqex2k.francoudi.com>
	<4CDE27D7.7070706@postnewspapers.com.au>
	<4CDEDB3A.2070606@vmsinfo.com>

On 11/14/2010 02:38 AM, Mladen Gogala wrote:
> Craig Ringer wrote:
>> It sounds like you're describing Oracle-style MVCC, using redo logs.
>>
>> http://blogs.sybase.com/database/2009/04/mvcc-dispelling-some-oracle-fudunderstanding-the-cost/
>>

> Craig, this is an interesting blog page, making some valid points about
> the multiversioning vs. locking. The ATM example, however, is
> unrealistic and couldn't have happened the way the author describes.

Yep, you're quite right. I was using it for its explanation of some of 
the costs of MVCC as Oracle implements it, because it's surprisingly 
hard to find explanations/analysis of that with some quick Google 
searching. I hadn't read beyond that part.

I'd be really interested in some *good* writeups of the costs/benefits 
of the various common mvcc and locking based rdbms implementations.

Thanks for posting a breakdown of the issues with that article, lest 
others be mislead. Appreciated.

--
Craig Ringer



view thread (29+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4CDF2910.8010105@postnewspapers.com.au>
Permalink:  ../4CDF2910.8010105@postnewspapers.com.au/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4CDF2910.8010105@postnewspapers.com.au

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: craig@postnewspapers.com.au, mladen.gogala@vmsinfo.com, kyriacosk@prime-tel.com
  Subject: Re: MVCC performance issue
  In-Reply-To: <4CDF2910.8010105@postnewspapers.com.au>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox