From: Mladen Gogala <mladen.gogala@vmsinfo.com>
To: Rich <rhdyes@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Performance of PostgreSQL over NFS
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:46:54 -0500
Message-ID: <4D112E5E.9090309@vmsinfo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=hBA=W=iqCfdNoaoPxhZw9pfZDVwLNUhVhjngW@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4D10FFEE.4070907@vmsinfo.com>
<AANLkTi=hBA=W=iqCfdNoaoPxhZw9pfZDVwLNUhVhjngW@mail.gmail.com>
Rich wrote:
> I am wondering why anyone would do that? Too much overhead and no
> reliable enough.
Apparently, NetApp thinks that it is reliable. They're selling that
stuff for years. I know that Oracle works with NetApp, they even have
their own user mode NFS client driver, I am not sure about PostgreSQL.
Did anybody try that?
--
Mladen Gogala
Sr. Oracle DBA
1500 Broadway
New York, NY 10036
(212) 329-5251
http://www.vmsinfo.com
The Leader in Integrated Media Intelligence Solutions
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mladen.gogala@vmsinfo.com, rhdyes@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Performance of PostgreSQL over NFS
In-Reply-To: <4D112E5E.9090309@vmsinfo.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox