From: Mario Weilguni <roadrunner6@gmx.at>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Which RAID Controllers to pick/avoid?
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:57:57 +0100
Message-ID: <4D4AC275.7090105@gmx.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimyRh1ieWxpCo1ht2D1fkmL+Ca_8ABBEw6yN2WR@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimyRh1ieWxpCo1ht2D1fkmL+Ca_8ABBEw6yN2WR@mail.gmail.com>
Am 03.02.2011 00:15, schrieb Dan Birken:
> I'm setting up a dedicated linux postgres box with 2x300GB 15k SAS
> drive in a RAID 1, though if future load dictates we would like to be
> able to upgrade to RAID 10. The hosting provider offers the following
> options for a RAID controller (all are the same price):
Adaptec at least has good tools for managing the controller, and
performance in our RAID-1 (DB) and RAID-5 setups (Files) is very good. I
don't think you can do wrong with the Adaptec controllers.
Can't say much regarding LSI, but avoid cheap HP controllers.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: roadrunner6@gmx.at
Subject: Re: Which RAID Controllers to pick/avoid?
In-Reply-To: <4D4AC275.7090105@gmx.at>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox