pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:51:24 +1300
Message-ID: <4D4B235C.1080308@catalyst.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D4B17B4.9030406@vmsinfo.com>
References: <201102012247.p11Ml6u02682@momjian.us>
	<4D48914B.4050403@dunslane.net>
	<4D489AD1.1010105@vmsinfo.com>
	<AANLkTiknZi97dDwm7sHqy0EL7tpNEP9sY5uPV6AN+q=u@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D499E55.4020107@vmsinfo.com>
	<4D49A6B9.4060608@2ndquadrant.com>
	<4D49C482.4010707@vmsinfo.com>
	<4D49F0BA.9000901@2ndquadrant.com>
	<4D4A16BF.1020304@vmsinfo.com>
	<4D4A4844.3020409@2ndquadrant.com>
	<4D4AD9F6.6040903@vmsinfo.com>
	<4D4AE16E.9040807@peak6.com>
	<4D4B17B4.9030406@vmsinfo.com>

On 04/02/11 10:01, Mladen Gogala wrote:
> In the meantime, the fire is burning. What should the hapless owner of 
> the database application do in the meantime? Tell the users that it 
> will be better in the next version? As I've said before: hints are 
> make it or break it point. Without hints, I cannot consider Postgres 
> for the mission critical projects. I am managing big databases for 
> living and I flatter myself that after more than two decades of doing 
> it, I am not too bad at it.

This is somewhat of a straw man argument. This sort of query that the 
optimizer does badly usually gets noticed during the test cycle i.e 
before production, so there is some lead time to get a fix into the 
code, or add/subtract indexes/redesign the query concerned.

The cases I've seen in production typically involve "outgrowing" 
optimizer parameter settings: (e.g work_mem, effective_cache_size) as 
the application dataset gets bigger over time. I would note that this is 
*more* likely to happen with hints, as they lobotomize the optimizer so 
it *cannot* react to dataset size or distribution changes.

regards

Mark



view thread (246+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4D4B235C.1080308@catalyst.net.nz>
Permalink:  ../4D4B235C.1080308@catalyst.net.nz/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4D4B235C.1080308@catalyst.net.nz

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
  In-Reply-To: <4D4B235C.1080308@catalyst.net.nz>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox