From: Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>
To: Krzysztof Chodak <krzysztof.chodak@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Variable versus constrant size tuples
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:03:10 -0500
Message-ID: <4E4E7B2E.1040209@squeakycode.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMiSJ3owAHsAvbMnZKt-Qd1meuuNUrzxPom5L788fiOp2m7mRg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMiSJ3owAHsAvbMnZKt-Qd1meuuNUrzxPom5L788fiOp2m7mRg@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/19/2011 4:03 AM, Krzysztof Chodak wrote:
> Is there any performance benefit of using constant size tuples?
>
If you are referring to varchar(80) vs text, then no, there is no benefit.
-Andy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: andy@squeakycode.net, krzysztof.chodak@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Variable versus constrant size tuples
In-Reply-To: <4E4E7B2E.1040209@squeakycode.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox