pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>
To: Igor Chudov <ichudov@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 09:36:25 -0500
Message-ID: <4E6CC769.10604@squeakycode.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMhtkAY2GvGiTz23V10Bev-ibrPWE7GowocT3KeWKm1EoED7WA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMhtkAbK7saRO_Tayb1nS3YLWN=Wns=Ci47qs-3YbX0T2+hkpA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOR=d=0zmw-EGRJyYmwCTxR5g6osbFLS5i-3kzjG05j7S=1JaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMhtkAah2c4XfSec=OtgL1V51wpD=jygbZnBVBRYCV02MscebQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGTBQpYa+VUXtKZtUDLSosboSMgUEOCd_dkmCPA=4HkjHw2r2g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMhtkAY2GvGiTz23V10Bev-ibrPWE7GowocT3KeWKm1EoED7WA@mail.gmail.com>

On 09/11/2011 09:21 AM, Igor Chudov wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com <mailto:klaussfreire@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Igor Chudov <ichudov@gmail.com <mailto:ichudov@gmail.com>> wrote:
>      > Well, right now, my server has twelve 7,200 RPM 2TB hard drives in a RAID-6
>      > configuration.
>      > They are managed by a 3WARE 9750 RAID CARD.
>      >
>      > I would say that I am not very concerned with linear relationship of read
>      > speed to disk speed. If that stuff is somewhat slow, it is OK with me.
>
>     With Raid 6 you'll have abysmal performance on write operations.
>     In data warehousing, there's lots of writes to temporary files, for
>     sorting and stuff like that.
>
>     You should either migrate to raid 10, or set up a separate array for
>     temporary files, perhaps raid 0.
>
>
> Thanks. I will rebuild the RAID array early next week and I will see if I have a Raid 10 option with that card.
>
> Quantitatively, what would you say is the write speed difference between RAID 10 and RAID 6?
>

Note that using RAID 10, while faster, cuts your usable space in half. 12 2TB drives in raid 10 == 6 drives * 2TB == 12 TB total space.  That's not big enough, is it?

-Andy



view thread (48+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4E6CC769.10604@squeakycode.net>
Permalink:  ../4E6CC769.10604@squeakycode.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4E6CC769.10604@squeakycode.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: andy@squeakycode.net, ichudov@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB
  In-Reply-To: <4E6CC769.10604@squeakycode.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox