From: Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: RAID Controller (HP P400) beat by SW-RAID?
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:22:03 +0200
Message-ID: <4E6EF68B.8020702@tweakers.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO2AxyoGvmRYtq=1=weOU_CCnAxK8FboBa8GWS6XZ923CXCCgA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAO2AxyoGvmRYtq=1=weOU_CCnAxK8FboBa8GWS6XZ923CXCCgA@mail.gmail.com>
On 12-9-2011 0:44 Anthony Presley wrote:
> A few weeks back, we purchased two refurb'd HP DL360's G5's, and were
> hoping to set them up with PG 9.0.2, running replicated. These machines
> have (2) 5410 Xeon's, 36GB of RAM, (6) 10k SAS drives, and are using the
> HP SA P400i with 512MB of BBWC. PG is running on an ext4 (noatime)
> partition, and they drives configured as RAID 1+0 (seems with this
> controller, I cannot do JBOD).
If you really want a JBOD-setup, you can try a RAID0 for each available
disk, i.e. in your case 6 separate RAID0's. That's how we configured our
Dell H700 - which doesn't offer JBOD as well - for ZFS.
Best regards,
Arjen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: acmmailing@tweakers.net
Subject: Re: RAID Controller (HP P400) beat by SW-RAID?
In-Reply-To: <4E6EF68B.8020702@tweakers.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox