pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Intel 710 pgbench write latencies
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:04:30 +0100
Message-ID: <4EB15BFE.9000309@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EB1081A0200002500042927@gw.wicourts.gov>
References: <4EB14002.1020306@gmail.com>
	<4EB1081A0200002500042927@gw.wicourts.gov>

On 2011-11-02 15:06, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Yeb Havinga<yebhavinga@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> I'm now contemplating not using the 710 at all. Why should I not
>> buy two 6Gbps SSDs without supercap (e.g. Intel 510 and OCZ Vertex
>> 3 Max IOPS) with a IO controller+BBU?
>
> Wouldn't the data be subject to loss between the time the IO
> controller writes to the SSD and the time it makes it from buffers
> to flash RAM?

Good question. My guess would be no, if the raid controller does 
'write-throughs' on the attached disks, and the SSD's don't lie about 
when they've written to RAM.

I'll put this on my to test list for the new setup.

-- Yeb




view thread (16+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4EB15BFE.9000309@gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../4EB15BFE.9000309@gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4EB15BFE.9000309@gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: yebhavinga@gmail.com, Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov
  Subject: Re: Intel 710 pgbench write latencies
  In-Reply-To: <4EB15BFE.9000309@gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox