pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>
To: sthomas@peak6.com
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Intel 710 pgbench write latencies
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:40:56 +0100
Message-ID: <4EB2A7F8.7020807@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EB2A5DE.80300@peak6.com>
References: <4EB14002.1020306@gmail.com>
	<CAHyXU0xaE_Lj24yyHPgaZk8-HsB31Tu2RiNT5RUy++9NRsEMnw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EB15EB7.2000906@gmail.com>
	<4EB1ABD1.4060405@gmail.com>
	<CAHyXU0z7GriCtS7LznwmvF_pKBbn-oOtT8mpnjF2Z20n++5LQg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EB26129.3090700@gmail.com>
	<4EB2A5DE.80300@peak6.com>

On 2011-11-03 15:31, Shaun Thomas wrote:
> On 11/03/2011 04:38 AM, Yeb Havinga wrote:
>
>> Both comparable near 10K tps.
>
> That's another thing I was wondering about. Why are we talking about 
> Vertex 2 Pro's, anyway? The Vertex 3 Pros post much better results and 
> are still capacitor-backed.
>

Not for sale yet..

-- Yeb




view thread (16+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4EB2A7F8.7020807@gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../4EB2A7F8.7020807@gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4EB2A7F8.7020807@gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: yebhavinga@gmail.com, sthomas@peak6.com, mmoncure@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Intel 710 pgbench write latencies
  In-Reply-To: <4EB2A7F8.7020807@gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox