From: Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: manually force planner to use of index A vs index B
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 16:10:05 +0100
Message-ID: <4EDA3BCD.30507@fuzzy.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322922869210-5044616.post@n5.nabble.com>
References: <1322922869210-5044616.post@n5.nabble.com>
On 3.12.2011 15:34, MirrorX wrote:
>
> but, at some point there are some bulk inserts with a different date. when
> this happens and i run the query mentioned above the planner is using index
> A and not index B.
> i guess this happens b/c the planner due to the last analyze statistics has
> no values of the new date and so it thinks that it is faster to use index A
> than index B since the rows that it will search are few. but that's not the
> case so this query takes much longer to finish than it would take if it used
> the index B.
Probably. But you haven't posted any explain plans and I've broken my
crystall ball yesterday, so I can only guess.
Do this:
1) get EXPLAIN ANALYZE of the query running fine
2) do the bulk update
3) get EXPLAIN ANALYZE of the query (this time it uses the wrong index)
4) run ANALYZE on the table
5) get EXPLAIN ANALYZE of the query (should be using the right index)
and post the tree explain plans.
> i have thought of some work-arounds to resolve this situation. for example i
> could change the definition of index A to (columnA,date) and i could also
> run an analyze command after every bulk insert. Another option would be to
> reduce autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor to a very low value so that analyze
> would be forced to be made much more often.
That is not a workaround, that is a solution. The database needs
reasonably accurate statistics to prepare good plans, that's how it works.
If you know that the bulk insert is going to make the statistics
inaccurate, you should run ANALYZE manually at the end. Or you might let
autovacuum take care of that. But the autovacuum won't fix that
immediately - it's running each minute or so, so the queries executed
before that will see the stale stats.
You may lower the autocacuum naptime, you may make it more aggressive,
but that means more overhead.
Tomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tv@fuzzy.cz
Subject: Re: manually force planner to use of index A vs index B
In-Reply-To: <4EDA3BCD.30507@fuzzy.cz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox