pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: darklow <darklow@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Query planner doesn't use index scan on tsvector GIN index if LIMIT is specifiedQuery planner doesn't use index scan on tsvector GIN index if LIMIT is specified
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:42:35 +0100
Message-ID: <4F0CB0CB.7090101@krogh.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25378.1326215074@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <CANxtv6XiuiqEkXRJU2vk=xKAFXrLeP7uVhgR-XMCyjgQz29EFQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<25378.1326215074@sss.pgh.pa.us>

On 2012-01-10 18:04, Tom Lane wrote:
> darklow<darklow@gmail.com>  writes:
>> But the performance problems starts when i do the same query specifying
>> LIMIT.
>> *SELECT id FROM cache WHERE tsv @@ to_tsquery('test:*') limit 20;*
>> By some reason index is not used.
> It apparently thinks there are enough matches that it might as well just
> seqscan the table and expect to find some matches at random, in less
> time than using the index would take.
>
> The estimate seems to be off quite a bit, so maybe raising the stats
> target for this column would help.
The cost of matching ts_match_vq against a toasted column
is not calculated correctly. This is completely parallel with
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-11/msg01754.php

Try raising the cost for ts_match_vq(tsvector,tsquery) that help a bit, but
its hard to get the cost high enough.

Raising statistics target  helps too..

-- 
Jesper



view thread (4+ messages)

Message-ID: <4F0CB0CB.7090101@krogh.cc>
Permalink:  ../4F0CB0CB.7090101@krogh.cc/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4F0CB0CB.7090101@krogh.cc

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jesper@krogh.cc, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, darklow@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Query planner doesn't use index scan on tsvector GIN index if LIMIT is specifiedQuery planner doesn't use index scan on tsvector GIN index if LIMIT is specified
  In-Reply-To: <4F0CB0CB.7090101@krogh.cc>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox