From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy <angelflow@yahoo.com>
Cc: Ofer Israeli <oferi@checkpoint.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: TCP Overhead on Local Loopback
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 21:11:03 -0400
Message-ID: <4F78FCA7.8010307@dunslane.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGTBQpZfvX7LznT35+WFQMZKUMuogqDFRLnky3BWRUz9-bFVRg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <217DDBC2BB1E394CA9E7446337CBDEF20102DEDB4A58@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>
<1333317709.70394.YahooMailNeo@web111301.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
<4F78EABF.2050209@dunslane.net>
<CAGTBQpZfvX7LznT35+WFQMZKUMuogqDFRLnky3BWRUz9-bFVRg@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/01/2012 08:29 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>>> You could try using Unix domain socket and see if the performance
>>> improves. A relevant link:
>>
>> He said Windows. There are no Unix domain sockets on Windows. (And please
>> don't top-post)
> Windows supports named pipes, which are functionally similar, but I
> don't think pg supports them.
>
Correct, so telling the OP to have a look at them isn't at all helpful.
And they are not supported on all Windows platforms we support either
(specifically not on XP, AIUI).
cheers
andrew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: andrew@dunslane.net, klaussfreire@gmail.com, angelflow@yahoo.com, oferi@checkpoint.com
Subject: Re: TCP Overhead on Local Loopback
In-Reply-To: <4F78FCA7.8010307@dunslane.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox