pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>
To: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
To: Pgsql-Performance ((E-mail)) <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:52:45 -0700
Message-ID: <4F853BBA-175C-4B3E-BAF4-AA34B80DF6EF@blighty.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4460BA8B.7010600@commandprompt.com>
References: <e3pmkc$12mk$1@news.hub.org>
	<473FC220-A52C-4954-81E9-A14ED33164C2@blighty.com>
	<4460BA8B.7010600@commandprompt.com>


On May 9, 2006, at 8:51 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

("Using SATA drives is always a bit of risk, as some drives are lying  
about whether they are caching or not.")

>> Don't buy those drives. That's unrelated to whether you use hardware
>> or software RAID.
>
> Sorry that is an extremely misleading statement. SATA RAID is  
> perfectly acceptable if you have a hardware raid controller with a  
> battery backup controller.

If the drive says it's hit the disk and it hasn't then the RAID  
controller
will have flushed the data from its cache (or flagged it as correctly
written). At that point the only place the data is stored is in the non
battery backed cache on the drive itself. If something fails then you'll
have lost data.

You're not suggesting that a hardware RAID controller will protect
you against drives that lie about sync, are you?

>
> And dollar for dollar, SCSI will NOT be faster nor have the hard  
> drive capacity that you will get with SATA.

Yup. That's why I use SATA RAID for all my databases.

Cheers,
   Steve



view thread (49+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4F853BBA-175C-4B3E-BAF4-AA34B80DF6EF@blighty.com>
Permalink:  ../4F853BBA-175C-4B3E-BAF4-AA34B80DF6EF@blighty.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4F853BBA-175C-4B3E-BAF4-AA34B80DF6EF@blighty.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: steve@blighty.com, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid
  In-Reply-To: <4F853BBA-175C-4B3E-BAF4-AA34B80DF6EF@blighty.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox