From: Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: MemSQL the "world's fastest database"?
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 00:18:43 -0400
Message-ID: <4FEFCFA3.50305@2ndQuadrant.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FE8582F0200002500048AAD@gw.wicourts.gov>
References: <CAFwQ8rcpbZsR3Ndk8GoVsqGhc8y+M8siBmMDN1X=mom4uAO8ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
<4FE8582F0200002500048AAD@gw.wicourts.gov>
On 06/25/2012 01:23 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Craig James<cjames@emolecules.com> wrote:
>
>> It claims to be "the world's fastest database."
>
>> [link where they boast of 80,000 tps read-only]
>
> 20,000 tps? Didn't we hit well over 300,000 tps in read-only
> benchmarks of PostgreSQL with some of the 9.2 performance
> enhancements?
It's 20K TPS on something that MySQL will only do 3.5 TPS. The queries
must be much heavier than the ones PostgreSQL can get 200K+ on. We'd
have to do a deeper analysis of the actual queries used to know exactly
how much heavier though. They might be the type MySQL is usually faster
than PostgreSQL on (i.e. ones using simple operations and operators), or
they could be ones where PostgreSQL is usually faster than MySQL (i.e.
more complicated joins). All I can tell you for sure if that they used
a query mix that makes MemSQL look much faster than MySQL.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: greg@2ndQuadrant.com
Subject: Re: MemSQL the "world's fastest database"?
In-Reply-To: <4FEFCFA3.50305@2ndQuadrant.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox