pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Ruben Rubio Rey <ruben@rentalia.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Array performance
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:51:44 -0500
Message-ID: <5000.1143215504@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4423E90E.2090607@rentalia.com>
References: <200603170625.k2H6PJ926955@pillette.com>
	<1143112188.2810.27.camel@theo-laptop.int.coza.net.za>
	<20060323132448.GB4881@surnet.cl>
	<4423E90E.2090607@rentalia.com>

Ruben Rubio Rey <ruben@rentalia.com> writes:
> SELECT (array[20]+array[21]+ ... +array[50]+array[51]) as total
> FROM table
> WHERE
> (array[20]+array[21]+ ... +array[50]+array[51])<5000
> AND array[20]<>0
> AND array[21]<>0
>  ...
> AND array[50]<>0
> AND array[51])<>0

> Any ideas to make this query faster?

What's the array datatype?  Integer or float would probably go a lot
faster than NUMERIC, if that's what you're using now.

			regards, tom lane



view thread (7+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <5000.1143215504@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../5000.1143215504@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/5000.1143215504@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, ruben@rentalia.com
  Subject: Re: Array performance
  In-Reply-To: <5000.1143215504@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox