From: Ioannis Anagnostopoulos <ioannis@anatec.com>
To: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: A very long running query....
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 22:27:31 +0100
Message-ID: <5009CD43.8000300@anatec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGTBQpa07PMrLA3qsM9Zf9QXcPvgntyVX7qL9CqEwQtK9LH1hA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5007FC82.9070007@anatec.com>
<5009CB5A.7070801@anatec.com>
<CAGTBQpa07PMrLA3qsM9Zf9QXcPvgntyVX7qL9CqEwQtK9LH1hA@mail.gmail.com>
On 20/07/2012 22:23, Claudio Freire wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Ioannis Anagnostopoulos
> <ioannis@anatec.com> wrote:
>> " -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..20942.93 rows=53 width=144) (actual
>> time=62.174..17783236.718 rows=387105 loops=1)"
>> " Join Filter: (feed_all_y2012m07.message_copies.msg_id =
>> feed_all_y2012m07.ship_pos_messages.msg_id)"
>> " -> Append (cost=0.00..19057.93 rows=53 width=33) (actual
>> time=62.124..5486473.545 rows=387524 loops=1)"
> Misestimated row counts... did you try running an analyze, or upping
> statistic targets?
I have run analyse every so often. I think the problem is that as I get
16K new rows every minutes, the "stats" are always out... Possible?
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: ioannis@anatec.com, klaussfreire@gmail.com
Subject: Re: A very long running query....
In-Reply-To: <5009CD43.8000300@anatec.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox