pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
To: Aleksei Arefjev <aleksei.arefjev@nordicgaming.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: transactions start time
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 18:21:38 +0100
Message-ID: <500ED9A2.3040101@archonet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFTgB8iMS8LYLbdCTmv=RBzDHhFaCvEBG9CAD3EyDxzuBvyTMA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFTgB8iMS8LYLbdCTmv=RBzDHhFaCvEBG9CAD3EyDxzuBvyTMA@mail.gmail.com>

On 24/07/12 12:14, Aleksei Arefjev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In statistical reports gathered by PgBadger on our PostgreSQL databases
> almost always we have in "Queries that took up the most time" report
> table information about transactions start time ('BEGIN;' command).
> Something like that in example below:
>
> 2    3h34m52.26s    48,556,167    0.00s    BEGIN;
>
>                          0.82s | BEGIN;
>                          0.82s | BEGIN;
>                          0.82s | BEGIN;
>                          0.81s | BEGIN;
>                          0.81s | BEGIN;
>                          0.81s | BEGIN;
>                          0.80s | BEGIN;
>                          0.80s | BEGIN;
>                          0.79s | BEGIN;
>                          0.79s | BEGIN;

I'm not sure if I'm reading this right, but are there more than 48 
million BEGINs that took 0s each (presumably rounded down) and then a 
handful taking about 0.8s?

If so, then it's likely nothing to do with the BEGIN and just that the 
machine was busy doing other things when you started a transaction.

> Databases placed on different hardware, OS - Debian GNU/Linux,
> PostgreSQL 9.1
>
> So, questions are:
> 1. Is this a normal situation with transactions start time ( BEGIN method) ?

See above

> 2. How can we reduce transactions start time if it's possible in principle?

Below 0.00? Probably not

> 3. What happens in PostgreSQL on transaction starting time? Can someone
> describe this process in detail? (of course, I saw in PostgreSQL source
> code, for example, definition such kind functions, like StartTransaction
> function, but it's not so easy to understand for third-party researcher,
> that all of these operations mean in real for performance)

Well there are two important things to understand:
1. All* commands run in a transaction
2. I think most of the work in getting a new snapshot etc gets pushed 
back until it's needed.

So - the overall impact of issuing BEGIN should be close to zero.

-- 
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd



view thread (6+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <500ED9A2.3040101@archonet.com>
Permalink:  ../500ED9A2.3040101@archonet.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/500ED9A2.3040101@archonet.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: dev@archonet.com, aleksei.arefjev@nordicgaming.com
  Subject: Re: transactions start time
  In-Reply-To: <500ED9A2.3040101@archonet.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox