From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff <foo@meisterderspiele.de>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: ZFS vs. UFS
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 09:00:37 +0200
Message-ID: <500F9995.2020100@meisterderspiele.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <500EEB05.6030005@shopzeus.com>
References: <500E9A3B.3070609@shopzeus.com>
<jumb4n$44v$1@dont-email.me>
<500EEB05.6030005@shopzeus.com>
>> On 24.07.2012 14:51, Laszlo Nagy wrote:
>>
>>> * UFS is not journaled.
>>
>> There is journal support for UFS as far as i know. Please have a look
>> at the gjournal manpage.
>
> Yes, but gjournal works for disk devices.
That isn't completly correct! gjournal works with all GEOM-devices,
which could be not only disk devices, but also (remote) disk devices,
(remote) files, (remote) software-raids etc.
It is very easy to mirror the *complete* disk from one *server* to
another. I use this technic for customers which need cheap backups of
their complete server.
But a RAID card will be much faster than this. I just wanted to make
this clear.
Greetings,
Torsten
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: foo@meisterderspiele.de
Subject: Re: ZFS vs. UFS
In-Reply-To: <500F9995.2020100@meisterderspiele.de>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox