From: Shaun Thomas <sthomas@optionshouse.com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Loose Index Scans by Planner?
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:22:12 -0500
Message-ID: <5037F084.3080401@optionshouse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <503792790200002500049B56@gw.wicourts.gov>
References: <5037A9C5.4030701@optionshouse.com>
<503792790200002500049B56@gw.wicourts.gov>
On 08/24/2012 02:40 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Well, that'd be the icing on the cake. I'd be overjoyed to get the
> cake. :-)
Yes indeed. The "cake" would fix the DISTINCT case, which I see way more
often in the wild than my index column-skip.
--
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 500 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-444-8534
sthomas@optionshouse.com
______________________________________________
See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: sthomas@optionshouse.com, Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov
Subject: Re: Loose Index Scans by Planner?
In-Reply-To: <5037F084.3080401@optionshouse.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox