pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shaun Thomas <sthomas@optionshouse.com>
To: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Julien Cigar <jcigar@ulb.ac.be>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:18:49 -0500
Message-ID: <5075BC09.8010006@optionshouse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGTBQpZ0E2xyAeNZy6a4uyhzyfhSNMv3TRDeLWdeT16RYYMPOg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADKbJJUTr9ZWkbajR-7_6qaAsWH0=09=2AMo67C_Az-raKZE4w@mail.gmail.com>
	<50752DB2.6060004@ulb.ac.be>
	<20121010161012.GE11892@momjian.us>
	<CAGTBQpZ0E2xyAeNZy6a4uyhzyfhSNMv3TRDeLWdeT16RYYMPOg@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/10/2012 12:05 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:

> Why does nobody every mention that concurrent access has to be taken
> into account?

That's actually a good point. But if you have one giant database, the 
overlap of which tables are being accessed by various sessions is going 
to be immense.

There probably should be a point about this in the docs, though. There 
are more and more shared-hosting setups or places that spread their data 
horizontally across separate databases for various clients, and in those 
cases, parallel usage does not imply overlap.

-- 
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 500 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-444-8534
sthomas@optionshouse.com

______________________________________________

See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email




view thread (34+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <5075BC09.8010006@optionshouse.com>
Permalink:  ../5075BC09.8010006@optionshouse.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/5075BC09.8010006@optionshouse.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: sthomas@optionshouse.com, klaussfreire@gmail.com, bruce@momjian.us, jcigar@ulb.ac.be
  Subject: Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server
  In-Reply-To: <5075BC09.8010006@optionshouse.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox