pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: HT on or off for E5-26xx ?
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:31:06 -0700
Message-ID: <5099D5FA.90802@boreham.org> (raw)


I'm bringing up a new type of server using Intel E5-2620 (unisocket) 
which was selected for good SpecIntRate performance vs cost/power (201 
for $410 and 95W).

Was assuming it was 6-core but I just noticed it has HT which is 
currently enabled since I see 12 cores in /proc/cpuinfo

Question for the performance experts : is it better to have HT enabled 
or disabled for this generation of Xeon ?
Workload will be moderately concurrent, small OLTP type transactions. 
We'll also run a few low-load VMs (using KVM) and a big Java application.

Any thoughts welcome.
Thanks.










view thread (10+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <5099D5FA.90802@boreham.org>
Permalink:  ../5099D5FA.90802@boreham.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/5099D5FA.90802@boreham.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: david_list@boreham.org
  Subject: Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ?
  In-Reply-To: <5099D5FA.90802@boreham.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox