pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shaun Thomas <sthomas@optionshouse.com>
To: Henri Philipps <henri.philipps@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Two Necessary Kernel Tweaks for Linux Systems
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:53:25 -0600
Message-ID: <50EEE3F5.7070405@optionshouse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABvEAQs7cRUH9PLHyTo-F+0t8=iKgX8N3ZSfCuzeSWXBJ9hM3w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50E4AAB1.9040902@optionshouse.com>
	<B994348460014EC7BA65F310E9D30EBD@BERNICE>
	<50EC6549.3090503@optionshouse.com>
	<CAOR=d=2g4iH+4U2Dkn2EZtTnZrescxp+MW10zehVUzX6a5GXSA@mail.gmail.com>
	<50EC6742.4090303@optionshouse.com>
	<CAOR=d=0R1GPVfhhy9w2+j=czNvgtbA519rY6-Or6sNegvQmdFQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<50EC743E.1040209@optionshouse.com>
	<CABvEAQs7cRUH9PLHyTo-F+0t8=iKgX8N3ZSfCuzeSWXBJ9hM3w@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

On 01/10/2013 02:51 AM, Henri Philipps wrote:

> http://research.cs.wisc.edu/adsl/Publications/meehean-thesis11.pdf

Wow, that was pretty interesting. It looks like for servers, the O(1) 
scheduler is much better even with the assignment bug he identified, and 
BFS responds better to varying load than CFS.

It's too bad the paper is so old and only considers the 2.6 kernel. I'd 
love to see this type of research applied to the latest.

> sched_latency_ns
> sched_min_granularity_ns
>
> I guess that higher numbers could improve performance too on systems
> with many cores and many connections.

I messed around with these a bit. Settings 10x smaller and 10x larger 
didn't do anything appreciable that I noticed. Performance metrics were 
within variance of my earlier tests. Only autogrouping and migration 
cost had any appreciable effect.

I'm glad we weren't the only ones who ran into this, too. You settled on 
a much higher setting than we did, but the end result was the same. I 
wonder how prevalent this will become as more servers are switched over 
to newer kernels in the next couple of years. Hopefully more people 
start complaining so they fix it. :)

-- 
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 500 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-676-8870
sthomas@optionshouse.com

______________________________________________

See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



view thread (17+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <50EEE3F5.7070405@optionshouse.com>
Permalink:  ../50EEE3F5.7070405@optionshouse.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/50EEE3F5.7070405@optionshouse.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: sthomas@optionshouse.com, henri.philipps@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Two Necessary Kernel Tweaks for Linux Systems
  In-Reply-To: <50EEE3F5.7070405@optionshouse.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox