From: AJ Weber <aweber@comcast.net>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: What setup would you choose for postgresql 9.2 installation?
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 09:04:48 -0500
Message-ID: <5134AA00.6080800@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31E8EC2A-72E9-419A-9CDD-5B646A534272@autouncle.com>
References: <31E8EC2A-72E9-419A-9CDD-5B646A534272@autouncle.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>
Apologies for the tangential question, but how would pgpool2 "increase
throughput"? Wouldn't the same number of statements be issued by your
application? It would likely reduce the number of concurrent
connections, but that doesn't necessarily equate to "increased throughput".
-AJ
On 3/4/2013 8:52 AM, Niels Kristian Schjødt wrote:
> LSI MegaRAID SAS 9260-4i with four Intel SSDSC2CW240A3K5 SSDs OR four Hitachi Ultrastar 15K600 SAS drives?
>
> My app is pretty write heavy and I have a lot of concurrent connections 300 - (though considering adding pgpool2 in front to increase throughput).
>
> Regards Niels Kristian
>
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: aweber@comcast.net
Subject: Re: What setup would you choose for postgresql 9.2 installation?
In-Reply-To: <5134AA00.6080800@comcast.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox