pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: New server setup
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:16:16 -0600
Message-ID: <5140DE90.5010009@boreham.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5140D226.4060609@pinpointresearch.com>
References: <4D6D1410-2208-4DAA-BD64-69BE1FD94E55@autouncle.com>
	<513CADB7.4030803@2ndQuadrant.com>
	<CAJY59_jNGwrPceXg8k04=1VWTTZTFTPTh+jGHopx92c+17Cj1w@mail.gmail.com>
	<51409C51.1070601@kickstone.com>
	<38D48FB0-92A8-433B-8D34-4C63738B45BA@gmail.com>
	<5140A623.20005@kickstone.com>
	<5140D226.4060609@pinpointresearch.com>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

On 3/13/2013 1:23 PM, Steve Crawford wrote:
>
> What concerns me more than wear is this:
>
> InfoWorld Article:
> http://www.infoworld.com/t/solid-state-drives/test-your-ssds-or-risk-massive-data-loss-researchers-w... 
>
>
> Referenced research paper:
> https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast13/understanding-robustness-ssds-under-power-fault 
>
>
> Kind of messes with the "D" in ACID.

It is somewhat surprising to discover that many SSD products are not 
durable under sudden power loss (what where they thinking!?, and ...why 
doesn't anyone care??).

However, there is a set of SSD types known to be designed to address 
power loss events that have been tested by contributors to this list.
Use only those devices and you won't see this problem. SSDs do have a 
wear-out mechanism but wear can be monitored and devices replaced in 
advance of failure. In practice longevity is such that most machines 
will be in the dumpster long before the SSD wears out. We've had 
machines running with several hundred wps constantly for 18 months using 
Intel 710 drives and the wear level SMART value is still zero.

In addition, like any electronics module (CPU, memory, NIC), an SSD can 
fail so you do need to arrange for valuable data to be replicated.
As with old school disk drives, firmware bugs are a concern so you might 
want to consider what would happen if all the drives of a particular 
type all decided to quit working at the same second in time (I've only 
seen this happen myself with magnetic drives, but in theory it could 
happen with SSD).







-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



view thread (38+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <5140DE90.5010009@boreham.org>
Permalink:  ../5140DE90.5010009@boreham.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/5140DE90.5010009@boreham.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: david_list@boreham.org
  Subject: Re: New server setup
  In-Reply-To: <5140DE90.5010009@boreham.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox