pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 9.2.3 upgrade reduced pgbench performance by 60%
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:34:24 -0700
Message-ID: <5150B4D0.3020902@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1CD2DD2A-C8C6-41CB-86CB-D44AE5E245CB@marketsworld.com>
References: <1CD2DD2A-C8C6-41CB-86CB-D44AE5E245CB@marketsworld.com>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>


> The Linux server is on a cloud and has 4GB RAM and 2 CPUs and the
> same server is running both master and slave (these are separate in
> production). If you'd like any more details please ask. Here are the
> pgbench results:

Presumably you created a new cloud server for 9.2, yes?  I'd guess that
the difference is between the two cloud servers.  Try testing, for
example, bonnie++ on the two servers.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



view thread (5+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <5150B4D0.3020902@agliodbs.com>
Permalink:  ../5150B4D0.3020902@agliodbs.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/5150B4D0.3020902@agliodbs.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: josh@agliodbs.com
  Subject: Re: 9.2.3 upgrade reduced pgbench performance by 60%
  In-Reply-To: <5150B4D0.3020902@agliodbs.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox