From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
Cc: Guillaume Cottenceau <gc@mnc.ch>
Cc: Mario Splivalo <mario.splivalo@megafon.hr>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Query much slower when run from postgres function
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:16:34 -0400
Message-ID: <5165.1236618994@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d4e0c10903091004m758d7ea2s91e33631be81215a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <49B51B60.6030600@megafon.hr>
<27649.1236616294@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<87fxhmmygj.fsf@meuh.mnc.lan>
<1d4e0c10903091004m758d7ea2s91e33631be81215a@mail.gmail.com>
Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet@gmail.com> writes:
> Unnamed prepared statements are planned after binding the values,
> starting with 8.3, or more precisely starting with 8.3.2 as early 8.3
> versions were partially broken on this behalf.
No, 8.2 did it too (otherwise we wouldn't have considered 8.3.0 to be
broken...). The thing I'm not too clear about is what "use of an
unnamed statement" translates to for a JDBC user.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, guillaume.smet@gmail.com, gc@mnc.ch, mario.splivalo@megafon.hr, pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Query much slower when run from postgres function
In-Reply-To: <5165.1236618994@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox