pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>
To: itishree sukla <itishree.sukla@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Check Pointer
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 15:26:39 +0300
Message-ID: <51A7457F.3040309@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL-g6VSk__SYiEUyHaSGgkF7GWy5EHSnZSDfxqD45=0oUqSbCA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL-g6VSk__SYiEUyHaSGgkF7GWy5EHSnZSDfxqD45=0oUqSbCA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

On 30.05.2013 15:09, itishree sukla wrote:
> In our server Check pointer process is consuming 8 GB of memory, what could
> be the possible reason? Can any one please help.

Are you sure you're measuring the memory correctly? The RES field in top 
output, for example, includes shared memory, ie. the whole buffer cache. 
Shared memory isn't really "consumed" by the checkpointer process, but 
shared by all postgres processes.

- Heikki


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



view thread (9+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <51A7457F.3040309@vmware.com>
Permalink:  ../51A7457F.3040309@vmware.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/51A7457F.3040309@vmware.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: hlinnakangas@vmware.com, itishree.sukla@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Check Pointer
  In-Reply-To: <51A7457F.3040309@vmware.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox