From: CS DBA <cs_dba@consistentstate.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: PostgreSQL settings for running on an SSD drive
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:56:28 -0600
Message-ID: <51C35E6C.1090705@consistentstate.com> (raw)
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>
All;
I'm working with a client running PostgreSQL on a Fusion-IO drive.
They have a PostgreSQL setup guide from Fusion recommending the
following settings:
effective_io_concurrency=0
bgwriter_lru_maxpages=0
random_page_cost=0.1
sequential_page_cost=0.1
These seem odd to me, effectively turning the background writer off,
plus setting both random_page_cost and sequential_page_cost to the same
(very low) value...
Thoughts?
Thanks in advance
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: cs_dba@consistentstate.com
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL settings for running on an SSD drive
In-Reply-To: <51C35E6C.1090705@consistentstate.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox