From: Shaun Thomas <sthomas@optionshouse.com>
To: Albin, Lloyd P <lalbin@scharp.org>
Cc: Dave Johansen <davejohansen@gmail.com>
Cc: bricklen <bricklen@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Partitions not Working as Expected
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:17:40 -0500
Message-ID: <51CC8FD4.10401@optionshouse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AE011E7AE62117479360E1E2BD341F4E08EE5B@adama.fhcrc.org>
References: <51CC652F.3010304@optionshouse.com>
<A76B25F2823E954C9E45E32FA49D70EC1BBD8EEA@mail.corp.perceptron.com>
<51CC73B6.2050406@optionshouse.com>
<CAGrpgQ_3pCLt3CJnap3z+nWe3-Q=A3sMH7OKP0sUeo79kViD8w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAcYxUfCaYbpAv-sQaNGKEVK2UZA1BtL87jM8LBd81ZomaLUuA@mail.gmail.com>
<51CC8160.2080905@optionshouse.com>
<AE011E7AE62117479360E1E2BD341F4E08EE5B@adama.fhcrc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>
On 06/27/2013 01:45 PM, Albin, Lloyd P wrote:
> We have also run into this with our production databases. We worked
> around the issue by adding an index to each child table so that it
> scans all the child index's instead of the child table's. For us
> this made a large performance improvement.
Haha. Yeah, that's assumed. I'd never use a partition set without the
constraint column in at least one index. The proof of concept was just
to illustrate that the planner doesn't even get that far in ignoring
"empty" partitions. Sure, scanning the inapplicable child tables has a
low cost, but it's not zero. With about a dozen of them, query times
increase from 0.130ms to 0.280ms for my test case. Not a lot in the long
run, but in a OLTP system, it can be fairly noticeable.
--
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 500 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-676-8870
sthomas@optionshouse.com
______________________________________________
See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: sthomas@optionshouse.com, lalbin@scharp.org, davejohansen@gmail.com, bricklen@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Partitions not Working as Expected
In-Reply-To: <51CC8FD4.10401@optionshouse.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox