From: Rafael Martinez <r.m.guerrero@usit.uio.no>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SQL statement over 500% slower with 9.2 compared with 9.1
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:19:27 +0200
Message-ID: <521C6F1F.5070901@usit.uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <521B4B2A.5010800@usit.uio.no>
References: <521B4B2A.5010800@usit.uio.no>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/26/2013 02:33 PM, Rafael Martinez wrote:
[............]
> The SQL statement is:
>
> SELECT firstname || ' ' || lastname AS Name FROM Person R WHERE
> R.gender like 'F' AND 19 < (SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT filmId) FROM
> FilmParticipation F WHERE F.partType = 'director' AND F.personId =
> R.personId ) AND NOT EXISTS ( SELECT * FROM
> FilmParticipation D WHERE D.partType = 'director' AND D.personId
> = R.personId AND NOT EXISTS ( SELECT * FROM FilmParticipation
> C WHERE C.partType = 'cast' AND C.filmId = D.filmId AND
> C.personId = D.personId ) ) ;
>
>
[.............]
>
> We can see that the query plan is very different between versions
> and that 9.2 is really wrong with the number of rows involved. Why
> is 9.2 taking so wrong about the number of rows involved in some
> parts of the plan?
>
Hei
More information:
If we turn off enable_indexscan the runtime gets more similar to the
one we get with 9.1, we are down to 4200ms.
The query plan with this configuration is here:
http://explain.depesz.com/s/jVR
The question remains the same, why is 9.2 using such a different and
bad plan compared to 9.1, when the data and the configuration are the
same?
regards,
- --
Rafael Martinez Guerrero
Center for Information Technology
University of Oslo, Norway
PGP Public Key: http://folk.uio.no/rafael/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlIcbx8ACgkQBhuKQurGihReJgCcCiEfGQ0rZHcazlN3Ihb2PeCn
jOsAnjkh1M0j4r1DQJ4Xb1djZ+y4mji3
=Td8b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: r.m.guerrero@usit.uio.no
Subject: Re: SQL statement over 500% slower with 9.2 compared with 9.1
In-Reply-To: <521C6F1F.5070901@usit.uio.no>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox