pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rural Hunter <ruralhunter@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Very slow planning performance on partition table
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:26:03 +0800
Message-ID: <53D1CE4B.4020104@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25010.1406253203@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <53CFB6BC.4050606@gmail.com>
	<25010.1406253203@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

2014/7/25 9:53, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rural
> [ shrug... ] Insufficient data.  When I try a simple test case based on
> what you've told us, I get planning times of a couple of milliseconds.
> I can think of contributing factors that would increase that, but not by
> four orders of magnitude.  So there's something very significant that
> you've left out.  Can you construct a self-contained test case that's
> this slow?
>
> 			regards, tom lane
>
No I cann't. I exported the db schema(without data) to another server 
and there is no problem. Is the planning time related to data volume? 
Anything else can I check? I already checked the default statistics 
target and it's the default value. I did change some statistics target 
on one column of the table, but the column is not involved in the slow 
planning query.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



view thread (21+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <53D1CE4B.4020104@gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../53D1CE4B.4020104@gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/53D1CE4B.4020104@gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: ruralhunter@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
  Subject: Re: Very slow planning performance on partition table
  In-Reply-To: <53D1CE4B.4020104@gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox