From: Rural Hunter <ruralhunter@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Very slow planning performance on partition table
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 09:18:59 +0800
Message-ID: <53D5A503.5060406@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24564.1406478487@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <53CFB6BC.4050606@gmail.com>
<25010.1406253203@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<53D26875.2080604@gmail.com>
<53D51E49.102@gmail.com>
<24564.1406478487@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>
Yes I checked. The connection I inspected is the longest running one.
There was no other connections blocking it. And I also see all locks are
granted for it. Does the planning phase require some internal locks?
在 2014/7/28 0:28, Tom Lane 写道:
> Yeah, that's what the stack trace suggests. Have you looked into pg_locks
> and pg_stat_activity to see which lock it wants and what's holding said
> lock?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: ruralhunter@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: Very slow planning performance on partition table
In-Reply-To: <53D5A503.5060406@gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox