pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rural Hunter <ruralhunter@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Very slow planning performance on partition table
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 08:10:35 +0800
Message-ID: <53D6E67B.1040003@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMkU=1ydmpt9XRMxt0sPNnQsXEoF_c7bgp2kHxtDbPNGg5Vj5w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <53CFB6BC.4050606@gmail.com>
	<25010.1406253203@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<53D26875.2080604@gmail.com>
	<53D51E49.102@gmail.com>
	<24564.1406478487@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CAMkU=1ydmpt9XRMxt0sPNnQsXEoF_c7bgp2kHxtDbPNGg5Vj5w@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">在 2014/7/29 1:29, Jeff Janes 写道:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAMkU=1ydmpt9XRMxt0sPNnQsXEoF_c7bgp2kHxtDbPNGg5Vj5w@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <div>If it were waiting on a pg_locks lock, the semop should
              be coming from ProcSleep, not from <span
                style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">LWLockAcquire,
                shouldn't it?</span></div>
            <div><span
                style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><br>
              </span></div>
            <div><font color="#000000" face="arial, sans-serif">I'm
                guessing he has a lot of connections, and each
                connection is locking each partition in shared mode in
                rapid fire, generating spin-lock or cache-line
                contention.</font></div>
            <div><font color="#000000" face="arial, sans-serif"><br>
              </font></div>
            <div>Cheers,</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>Jeff</div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    Yes. I have a lot of connections and they maybe coming together and
    doing the same update statement without partition key on the
    partition table.<br>
  </body>
</html>




view thread (21+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <53D6E67B.1040003@gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../53D6E67B.1040003@gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/53D6E67B.1040003@gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: ruralhunter@gmail.com, jeff.janes@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Very slow planning performance on partition table
  In-Reply-To: <53D6E67B.1040003@gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox