pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
To: Mkrtchyan, Tigran <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
Cc: postgres performance list <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:56:36 +1200
Message-ID: <541B4704.9090305@catalyst.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHyXU0xSJR=r4savNfMcpzxBh9ZzgMc4aZtD4DxramZiexkYSw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <45142416.42827.1411033201079.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de>
	<88549888.42916.1411034301200.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de>
	<CAHyXU0xSJR=r4savNfMcpzxBh9ZzgMc4aZtD4DxramZiexkYSw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

On 19/09/14 08:32, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Mkrtchyan, Tigran
> <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de> wrote:
>>
>> 9.3.5:
>>          0.035940        END;
>>
>>
>> 9.4beta2:
>>          0.957854        END;
>
>
> time being spent on 'END' is definitely suggesting i/o related issues.
> This is making me very skeptical that postgres is the source of the
> problem.   I also thing synchronous_commit is not set properly on the
> new instance (or possibly there is a bug or some such).  Can you
> verify via:
>
> select * from pg_settings where name = 'synchronous_commit';
>
> on both servers?
>

Yes, does look suspicious. It *could* be that the 9.4 case is getting 
unlucky and checkpointing just before the end of the 60s run, and 9.3 
isn't.

> What is iowait?  For pci-e SSD, these drives don't seem very fast...
>
>
>

These look like rebranded Micron P320's and should be extremely 
fast...However I note that my Crucial/Micron M550's are very fast for 
most writes *but* are much slower for sync writes (and fsync) that 
happen at commit...

Cheers

Mark


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



view thread (30+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <541B4704.9090305@catalyst.net.nz>
Permalink:  ../541B4704.9090305@catalyst.net.nz/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/541B4704.9090305@catalyst.net.nz

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz, mmoncure@gmail.com, tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de
  Subject: Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4
  In-Reply-To: <541B4704.9090305@catalyst.net.nz>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox