pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
To: Strahinja Kustudić <strahinjak@nordeus.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: 8xIntel S3500 SSD in RAID10 on Dell H710p
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 11:05:14 +1300
Message-ID: <5488C39A.8080904@catalyst.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADKbJJW=r24TABgnhkZF-Tc0bNk9feME-UKPaPBbFKsO=ptDXQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADKbJJXupGHhwJvYHCgDJeNnm-DHjAQh5RjbTVgwWK1nza2ubQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<5487C422.2000306@catalyst.net.nz>
	<CADKbJJW=r24TABgnhkZF-Tc0bNk9feME-UKPaPBbFKsO=ptDXQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

On 10/12/14 21:30, Strahinja Kustudić wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Mark Kirkwood <
> mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz> wrote:
>
>> That is interesting: I've done some testing on this type of card with 16
>> (slightly faster Hitachi) SSD attached. Setting WT and NORA should enable
>> the so-called 'fastpath' mode for the card [1]. We saw performance improve
>> markedly (300MB/s random write go to 1300MB/s).
>>
>> This *might* be related to the fact that 16 SSD can put out more IOPS than
>> the card can actually handle - whereas your 8 S3500 is probably the perfect
>> number (e.g 8*11000 = 88000 which the card can handle ok).
>>
>>
>> [1] If you make the change while there are no outstanding background
>> operations (array rebuild etc) in progress (see
>> http://www.flagshiptech.com/eBay/Dell/poweredgeh310h710h810UsersGuide.pdf
>> ).
>
>
> I read that guide too, which is the reason why I tried with WT/NORA, but
> the document also states:  "NOTE: RAID 10, RAID 50, and RAID 60 virtual
> disks cannot use FastPath." Which is a little odd, since usually if you
> want performance with reliability, you go RAID10.
>
> Do you have any suggestions what I could try to tweak to get more
> performance?
>

We are using these configured as *individual* drives on RAID0 that are 
then md raided in a (software) RAID 10 array. Maybe try that out (as 
fastpath only cares about the HW RAID setup).

Interestingly we were also seeing better performance on a fully HW RAID 
10 array with WT/NORA...so (I guess) our Hitachi SSD probably have lower 
latency than the S3500 does.

Cheers

Mark


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



view thread (7+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <5488C39A.8080904@catalyst.net.nz>
Permalink:  ../5488C39A.8080904@catalyst.net.nz/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/5488C39A.8080904@catalyst.net.nz

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz, strahinjak@nordeus.com
  Subject: Re: 8xIntel S3500 SSD in RAID10 on Dell H710p
  In-Reply-To: <5488C39A.8080904@catalyst.net.nz>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox