pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: ktm@rice.edu <ktm@rice.edu>
To: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Jan Gunnar Dyrset <jan.g.dyrset@cybernetica.no>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL disk fragmentation causes performance problems on Windows
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:56:12 -0400
Message-ID: <5540F10C.9030400@dunslane.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150429143543.GQ3510@aart.rice.edu>
References: <AMXPR05MB120CFF5F9A4825A531E2018A1ED0@AMXPR05MB120.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
	<20150429080639.GC14535@awork2.anarazel.de>
	<20150429080854.GD14535@awork2.anarazel.de>
	<5540E588.9080507@commandprompt.com>
	<20150429143543.GQ3510@aart.rice.edu>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>


On 04/29/2015 10:35 AM, ktm@rice.edu wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 07:07:04AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> On 04/29/2015 01:08 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>>
>>>> Which OS and filesystem is this done on? Because many halfway modern
>>>> systems, like e.g ext4 and xfs, implement this in the background as
>>>> 'delayed allocation'.
>>> Oh, it's in the subject. Stupid me, sorry for that. I'd consider testing
>>> how much better this behaves under a different operating system, as a
>>> shorter term relief.
>> This is a known issue on the Windows platform. It is part of the
>> limitations of that environment. Linux/Solaris/FreeBSD do not suffer
>> from this issue in nearly the same manner.
>>
>> jD
>>
> You might consider a CLUSTER or VACUUM FULL to re-write the table with
> less fragmentation.
>

Or pg_repack if you can't handle the lockup time that these involve.

cheers

andrew


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



view thread (10+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <5540F10C.9030400@dunslane.net>
Permalink:  ../5540F10C.9030400@dunslane.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/5540F10C.9030400@dunslane.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: andrew@dunslane.net, ktm@rice.edu, jd@commandprompt.com, andres@anarazel.de, jan.g.dyrset@cybernetica.no
  Subject: Re: PostgreSQL disk fragmentation causes performance problems on Windows
  In-Reply-To: <5540F10C.9030400@dunslane.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox