From: Christopher Petrilli <petrilli@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com>
Cc: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Impact of checkpoint_segments under continual load conditions
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:22:07 -0400
Message-ID: <59d991c4050719122213ac3d81@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8375.1121799193@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <59d991c4050717100874c08a86@mail.gmail.com>
<4541.1121788647@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<59d991c40507190930244ba9bb@mail.gmail.com>
<7224.1121791328@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<59d991c4050719095440cd3de5@mail.gmail.com>
<7436.1121792725@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<59d991c405071910133e28031a@mail.gmail.com>
<7843.1121796596@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<59d991c40507191148e6f9ec5@mail.gmail.com>
<8375.1121799193@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On 7/19/05, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Christopher Petrilli <petrilli@gmail.com> writes:
> > On 7/19/05, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> How *exactly* are you invoking psql?
>
> > It is a subprocess of a Python process, driven using a pexpect
> > interchange. I send the COPY command, then wait for the '=#' to come
> > back.
>
> Some weird interaction with pexpect maybe? Try adding "-n" (disable
> readline) to the psql command switches.
Um... WOW!
==> pgsql_benchmark_803_bigbuffers10000_noreadline.txt <==
0 0.0319459438324 0.0263829231262
1 0.0303978919983 0.0263390541077
2 0.0306499004364 0.0273139476776
3 0.0306959152222 0.0270659923553
4 0.0307791233063 0.0278429985046
5 0.0306351184845 0.0278820991516
6 0.0307800769806 0.0335869789124
7 0.0408310890198 0.0370559692383
8 0.0371310710907 0.0344209671021
9 0.0372560024261 0.0334041118622
==> pgsql_benchmark_803_bigbuffers10000.txt <==
0 0.0352520942688 0.149132013321
1 0.0320160388947 0.146126031876
2 0.0307128429413 0.139330863953
3 0.0306718349457 0.139590978622
4 0.0307030677795 0.140225172043
5 0.0306420326233 0.140012979507
6 0.0307261943817 0.139672994614
7 0.0307750701904 0.140661001205
8 0.0307800769806 0.141661167145
9 0.0306720733643 0.141198158264
First column is iteration, second is "gen time" to generate the load
file, and 3rd is "load time".
It doesn't stay QUITE that low, but it stays lower... quite a bit.
We'll see what happens over time.
Chris
--
| Christopher Petrilli
| petrilli@gmail.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: petrilli@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, lists@boutiquenumerique.com, vivek@khera.org
Subject: Re: Impact of checkpoint_segments under continual load conditions
In-Reply-To: <59d991c4050719122213ac3d81@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox