From: Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
To: "Nörder-Tuitje, Marcus" <noerder-tuitje@technology.de>
Cc: db@zigo.dhs.org
Cc: Gregory S. Williamson <gsw@globexplorer.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:16:57 -0500
Message-ID: <5FF559BF-4923-4122-AFC4-73F2ADAD9BC6@fastcrypt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16F953410A0F1346848DCB476A989CFE087890@swtexchange2.technology.de>
References: <16F953410A0F1346848DCB476A989CFE087890@swtexchange2.technology.de>
On 9-Jan-07, at 7:50 AM, Nörder-Tuitje, Marcus wrote:
> Forget abount "IN". Its horribly slow.
I think that statement above was historically correct, but is now
incorrect. IN has been optimized quite significantly since 7.4
Dave
>
> try :
>
> select w.appid,
> w.rate,
> w.is_subscribed,
> sum(w.hits) AS Hits,
> sum(w.sius) AS IUs,
> sum(w.total_amnt) AS Total,
> sum(w.hits) * w.rate AS ByHits,
> sum(w.sius) * w.rate AS BYIUS
> from bill_rpt_work w
> where (select b.report_id from billing_reports b where
> b.report_s_date = '2006-09-30' and w.report_id = b.report_id)
> and w.client_id IN ('227400001','2274000010')
> group by 1,2,3
> order by 1,2,3;
>
>
>
> should by faster;
>
> assuming : index on report_id in b; index on report_id, client_id in w
>
> to enforce useage of indexes on grouping (depends on result size),
> consider extending w with cols 1,2,3.
>
>
> regards,
> marcus
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org]Im Auftrag von
> db@zigo.dhs.org
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. Januar 2007 13:36
> An: Gregory S. Williamson
> Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
> Betreff: Re: [PERFORM] Horribly slow query/ sequential scan
>
>
> I don't think I understand the idea behind this query. Do you
> really need
> billing_reports twice?
>
>> The query:
>> explain analyze select
>> w.appid,w.rate,w.is_subscribed,sum(w.hits) AS Hits ,sum(w.sius) AS
>> IUs,
>> sum(w.total_amnt) AS Total,sum(w.hits) * w.rate AS ByHits,
>> sum(w.sius) * w.rate AS BYIUS
>> from bill_rpt_work w, billing_reports b
>> where w.report_id in
>> (select b.report_id from billing_reports where b.report_s_date =
>> '2006-09-30')
>> and (w.client_id = '227400001' or w.client_id = '2274000010')
>> group by 1,2,3
>> order by 1,2,3;
>
> Maybe this is the query you want instead?
>
> select w.appid,
> w.rate,
> w.is_subscribed,
> sum(w.hits) AS Hits,
> sum(w.sius) AS IUs,
> sum(w.total_amnt) AS Total,
> sum(w.hits) * w.rate AS ByHits,
> sum(w.sius) * w.rate AS BYIUS
> from bill_rpt_work w
> where w.report_id in
> (select b.report_id from billing_reports b where
> b.report_s_date =
> '2006-09-30')
> and (w.client_id = '227400001' or w.client_id = '2274000010')
> group by 1,2,3
> order by 1,2,3;
>
> /Dennis
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: pg@fastcrypt.com, noerder-tuitje@technology.de, db@zigo.dhs.org, gsw@globexplorer.com
Subject: Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan
In-Reply-To: <5FF559BF-4923-4122-AFC4-73F2ADAD9BC6@fastcrypt.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox